Holy Week and Liturgical Anamnesis

Egeria, a fifth-century woman who recorded one of the earliest accounts of Christian Holy Week observances.

Despite what contemporary “enlightened” theologizers might suggest, the church year was not developed overnight by some bored hermit in the Egyptian desert with nothing else to do but ponder the locusts and honey in his cave.  The church year developed soon after Jesus’ own ministry, when His disciples and followers wished to reenact, and therefore to teach Christians as well as neophytes, the essential doctrines of the Church.  Although sermons and lectures were part of it, the early Church realized that many people learn more through doing.  The Church in Jerusalem quickly started to revere the historical sites of Holy Week.  From the Mount of Olives to the Garden of Gethsemane to the hill of Golgotha, this particular Church was well-suited to relive the highlights of Jesus’ ministry.

A Christian woman named Egeria (writing from 404-417) maintained a series of journals which recounted her pilgrimages to holy sites, one of the most interesting being her description of being in Jerusalem during Pascha (Holy Week.)  In her description of the week’s events (which the writer of music notes cannot summarize nor condense, but which can be found on http://www.ccel.org/m/mcclure/etheria/etheria.htm), Egeria describes systematically in exacting detail how the faithful reenact the events of holy week in their worship.  For example, on the Sunday before Easter, they gather at the Mount of Olives to “sing hymns and antiphonies appropriate to the day and place, as are the readings.”  Shortly thereafter, “that place in the Gospel is read where infants with palms and branches ran to the Lord saying, ‘Blessed is He who comes in the name of the Lord.’  Immediately the bishop rises with all of the people and they walk before the bishop singing hymns. . . And whatever children in this place, even those not able to walk, are carried on their parent’s shoulders, all holding branches, some of palm, some of olive;  thus the bishop is led in the same way the Lord once was.”  On Thursday, the congregation regathers in the Garden of Gethsemane to hold the vigil the Apostles were unable to keep.  Of this Egeria writes, “. . . there a hymn is sung, prayer is made, and the bishop offers the Oblation and serves communion to everyone. . . and the place in the Gospel is read where the Lord was arrested.  While this passage is being read, there is such moaning and groaning with weeping among the people that they can be heard by all the people of the city.”  Imagine what a witness this must have been!  This continues all night, just as Jesus passed His last night on earth.

The next morning, the people meet at “Sion to pray at the column where the Lord was whipped.”  Shortly thereafter, they gather at Golgotha, which now has a church built upon it, and where is housed parts of the true cross.  (Which, Egeria tells us, is heavily guarded because “someone once bit off and stole some of the holy cross.”)  From noon to three, readings about the Passion are interspersed with prayers until the ninth hour (3pm) at which time “the passage in the Gospel of John is read, where He delivers up His spirit.”  The crowd then disperses until evening, after which time they gather at the Anastasis, or the Church of the Resurrection.  “And when they have come there, the passage in the gospel is read where Joseph asks Pilate for the body of the Lord, that he might place it in a new tomb. . . through the whole night hymns and antiphons are sung until morning.”  Saturday morning arrives where the “Paschal vigil is observed,” again spending the day and night in prayer, scripture and singing, although Egeria observes that confirmands would be baptized on this Holy Saturday.  The celebration of Easter culminates, apparently, at midnight, after the vigil service has been dismissed and the people process to the Church of the Resurrection (supposedly built over the Holy Sepulchre) at which time the resurrection gospel is read and the bishop celebrates Holy Communion.

In their reenactment of Christ’s last days, the Christian pilgrims are not only learning about Christ’s life, but they are participating in the sacraments (baptism was only offered on Holy Saturday and Pentecost) and learning application through sermons and hymns.  This was a multi-faceted approach toward catechesis, or the learning of the fundamentals of the faith.  Importantly, the pilgrims probably experienced the emotions associated with each location—the triumphant palm waving, the feeling of betrayal in the Garden, the sorrow and horror at Golgotha.  This is not some dry lesson from a book, nor an entertaining show.  Although Egeria does not note the fact, it seems that all these people—pilgrims plus those Christians living in Jerusalem—must essentially devote an entire week to these proceedings. . . not a small feat in an age in which the necessities of daily life were more difficult to obtain.  Egeria does allow that some people keep the pilgrimage more than others, who presumably would be distracted by mundane tasks;  however, “No one demands that anyone do anything, but all do as they can.  No one is praised who does more, nor is the one who does less blamed.  For such is the custom here.”  In other words, these are traditions which are evangelical. . . they teach the faith not only to the Christians but are a great witness to the unbeliever, and none of it is viewed as being essential to salvation.  These traditions are simply the best way available to imbue the truths of Christianity within the human heart.

So it is with us. We began Palm Sunday processing from the garden with palm branches, but the service ended somberly, singing “When I Survey the Wondrous Cross.”  We regathered on Thursday to meditate on the Lord’s mandatum novum—to “love one another,” as exemplified on the night He instituted Holy Communion.  The betrayal of that Thursday was also evidenced in the sadness of the stripping of the altar. A watch was kept overnight. On Friday, we somberly read of Jesus’ death on the cross, lamenting our sin which cause this. At Easter Vigil on Saturday we gather in candlelight, reading texts from the Old Testament, meditating on Christ passing “from death to life,” culminating in the return of the Gloria in Excelsis and a full celebration of the resurrection, which continues the next morning. We celebrate the Feast of the Resurrection with churches all over the world, most of whom participate in hymns, readings, teaching, and Holy Communion.  In this way, we are made one in Christ, whether it is our unity with the Invisible Church in the present age, or the Church Universal of centuries past.  We do not reenact this Paschal festival for our own amusement or boredom;  this anamnesis–or remembering the past by reliving it–is possibly the most important tool through which one is enabled to live out the gospel on a daily basis as one sanctified in the blood of the Lamb.



“My Song is Love Unknown”

This famous Lenten text was written by Samuel Crossman (1624-1683), an Anglican priest.  The Anglican Church at this time sang only psalms, so it is most likely that Crossman intended his text to be read as poetry, not to be sung as a hymn.  Crossman ministered successfully in the town of Sudbury, England, until 1662.  During this year, the British government had declared that every minister sign a document declaring faith in the infallibility of the Book of Common Prayer (the primary prayer book of the Anglicans and Episcopals to this day.)  Many clergy could not in good conscience sign this document, and they were expelled from the pulpit and from their homes and towns.  It is about this time that such “dissenters” (known as “Puritans”) began to emigrate to America.

Crossman later recanted and became one of the King’s chaplains!

It would be a hymnological travesty to sing fewer than all seven stanzas of this hymn (although far worse hymnological travesties have been and are still committed against church music.)  The hymn essentially briefly tells the entire story of the Christian faith.  The first stanza personalizes the hymn and asks, “Who am I that for my sake my Lord should take frail flesh and die?”  We know that Christ was divine before becoming human as the prologue to John’s gospel relates, “In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.”  The reader is introduced to the concept of incarnation, the idea that Christ became human (ie., the root carn- gives to English such a term as “carnal” and to other languages their word for “meat” or “flesh” [carne.])  The second stanza continues this incarnational idea that Christ came “from His blest throne salvation to bestow,” although “men made strange, and none the longed for Christ would know.”  As our liturgy will soon reveal, the fickle praises of the Palm Sunday crowd would soon become, in the words of the third stanza, “Crucify!”  This same humanity would save a murderer (Barabbas), but “The prince of life they slay.”  Crossman’s sixth stanza asks, “What may I say?  Heaven was His home but mine the tomb wherein He lay,” again personalizing what might have a tendency to become a theological abstraction.

This hymn presents law and gospel in a clearer manner than many hymns and songs these days.  We cannot read/sing it and feel good about humanity and ourselves.  It is easy to blame the short-sighted Jews of Jesus’ time for crucifying Him, but we know that our own sin warrants the same guilt.  It is us who cry “crucify” each time we sin, whether knowingly and willingly or simply unaware.  Yet, this hymn just as clearly presents the gospel.  We know that it was “mine the tomb wherein He lay,” so that the grave no longer has power over us.  We know that He “to suffering goes that He His foes from death might free.”  This is the true gospel message!  This is the crux of the Easter message which, of course, cannot be separated from our Lenten preparations.

What Wondrous Love is This

This hymn text was written anonymously and first published in Lynchburg, VA in A General Selection of Spiritual Songs (1811).  This tune, also composed anonymously and most likely best defined as a “folk tune,” first originates in print in Southern Harmony, New Haven, 1835.  The tune is “modal,” meaning it is neither major nor minor, sounding foreign to the modern ear.  Yet, many early American folk tunes were modal.  This rather dry information constitutes the known “facts” about this hymn.  Yet, the hymn proclaims something significant, speaking as it does from the early days of the American nation.

The first two stanzas proclaim Christ’s love for us in that it “. . . caused the Lord of bliss to bear the dreadful curse for my soul.”  This same love, “when I was sinking down beneath God’s righteous frown,” results in Christ becoming incarnate, laying “aside His crown for my soul.”  What, then, is this love?

In Greek, of course, there are several different meanings to our one English word “love.”  The sense of its use in the hymn reflects the use of “love” not only in the Gospel of John but in the epistles of John.  We know that “God is love.  Whoever lives in love lives in God, and God in him.”  (I John 4: 16b.)  Love here is agape. This is a type of unconditional love of which, truth be told, only God is capable.  This is sacrificial and selfless love, one that is evidenced in action.  As the writer of music notes has said before, the very-human notion of exchanging gifts, ubiquitous to all cultures, illustrates this theological concept.  We give gifts to those we love.  We do not merely speak words;  we give.  We give in either time, thought, or in physical goods.  Even the obligatory office party or routine Christmas gifts to one’s clients are meant to evoke a sense of appreciation, as artificial and misused as it may be these days.  In a similar way, the Holy Trinity did not merely lament the sin of humankind from afar;  rather, Christ was sent as the atoning sacrifice, living as a real person in the real world.  John speaks to of this:  “How great is the love the Father has lavished on us, that we should be called children of God!  And that is what we are!  The reason the world does not know us is that it did not know Him.”  (I John 3: 1)  The world [kosmos= “cosmos”] rejected Christ and the love He represented and embodied.

We may think that we “love” this food, that car, that music, or we may even love that person.  Yet, this is not agape.  We do not necessarily know God specifically from these manifestations of “love.”  We can only know love in this sense if we know God.  The Jews and Romans who crucified Jesus certainly, it must be thought, loved their families, their jobs, their possessions, but such “love” did not assist them in recognizing Christ for who He was.  Those types of love—of which we are still surrounded with today—do not necessarily lead to God.  Only those who know God can know what love is.  Hopefully, these other forms of “love” (the Greeks had several words for the different types of love) will proceed from the initial agape of God, which He has first “lavished” on us.  To paraphrase Bonhoeffer, we do not know God because we “love,” we love because we know God.

With this in mind, we rejoice in the words of the final stanza of our hymn, “And when from death I’m free, I’ll sing His love for me, and through eternity I’ll sing on!”

If Thou But Suffer God to Guide Thee

Georg Neumark

This morning the choir sings an anthem version of this German chorale, it is played as the communion voluntary, and sung as a communion hymn. This hymn, often sung during Lent, was written by Georg Neumark (1621-1681), a hymnwriter for whom the most productive part of his life was spent in the midst of the trials of the Thirty Years War (1618-1648), a war which decimated the European continent. After he had graduated from the Gymnasium (the German equivalent of our high school) Neumark joined a caravan on its way to Koenigsberg, to attend the only university not disrupted by the Thirty Years’ War.  While en route, the caravan was attacked by robbers, and Neumark lost all his possessions, save a prayer book and some money he had sown into his clothes.  Unable to arrive at Koenigsberg, he searched for employment in Magdeburg, Lueneberg, Winsen, and Hamburg, all to no avail.  Desperate for survival, a pastor friend in Kiel eventually obtained for Neumark the position of a tutor to a local judge.  Neumark wrote this hymn shortly after finding this employment.  His relief is evident in the stanzas:  “What gain is there in futile weeping, In helpless anger and distress?  If you are in His care and keeping, In sorrow will He love you less?  For He who took for you a cross will bring you safe through every loss.”  Certainly the Lord had brought Neumark through a great loss.  But the faith that inspired these words would again be tried.

After two years in the judge’s employment, Neumark had saved enough money to travel to Koenigsberg where he would study law and poetry for five years.  However, he again lost all his possessions, this time in a fire in 1648.  We consider his third stanza:  “In patient trust await His leisure, In cheerful hope, with heart content.  To take whatever your Father’s pleasure and all-discerning love have sent;  Doubt not your inmost wants are known to Him who chose you for His own.”  With great determination, Neumark continued moving from city to city and from one employment to the next in the ensuing years.  He finally ended up as court poet and librarian to Duke Wilhelm II of Sachse-Weimar.  He became a well-known poet (and a member of the poetic “Fruit-Bearing Society) during the last years of his life.  However, he was unable to accomplish his duties after he became blind in 1680.  Yet, he continued in the spirit of the fourth stanza of his hymn:  “Sing, pray, keep His ways unswerving, offer your service faithfully, and trust His word;  though undeserving, you’ll find His promise true to be.  God never will forsake in need the soul that trusts in Him indeed!”

A town besieged during the Thirty Years’ War.


Saviour, Again, to Thy Dear Name We Raise

This text was written by John Ellerton (1826-1893), an English country priest who enjoyed not only composing sacred verse (“The Day Thou Gavest, Lord is Ended”) but was a frequent collaborator on that great nineteenth-century English hymnal, Hymns Ancient and Modern (1861, although this hymn did not appear until the 1868 edition.)

Ellerton closes the first stanza of the original hymn with the lines, “We stand to bless Thee ere our worship cease; Then, lowly kneeling, wait Thy word of peace.” Anglican worship involves the body and all the senses, as reflected in liturgical postures. The second stanza concludes in the original, “Guard Thou the lips from sin, the hearts from shame, That in this house have call’d upon Thy Name.”  This is a prayer for sanctification, and the term “name” is used in a Wesleyan/Hebrew context.  When Jacob struggled with God in Genesis 32, Jacob implored God to tell him His name.  This God would not do, rather choosing to bless him instead.  To the Hebrews, one’s name was not merely a conglomeration of syllables, but it encompassed one’s essence and was completely inseparable from one’s personality;  hence, such attention was paid to Jesus naming before His birth. In Ellerton’s hymn we acknowledge that we have invoked God’s name in worship but, in so doing, we likewise realize we have been in His very presence through Word and sacrament.

The original third stanza (slightly altered in the Episcopal hymn) is uniquely British—“Grant us Thy peace, Lord, through the coming night;  Turn Thou for us its darkness into light;  From harm and danger keep Thy children free, For dark and light are both alike to Thee.”  In the British Isles, where it is known to be sunny for about a week in July and rather gloomy much the rest of the year, the appearance of the sun greatly contrasted with the gloom of darkness, and hymnwriters were continuously making theological comparisons.  (Another Victorian hymn which does this is “Abide with Me.”)

Ellerton here prays for peace “throughout our earthly life, our balm in sorrow, and our stay in strife.”  Ellerton is setting the world in a typical Victorian context.  The world is “very evil,” society is full of “change and decay” (“Abide with me”), but only God remains constant, a “rock and fortress.”  (Ps. 46)  This was not only a theological but a national perspective.  British society was no longer the pinnacle of Western society.  Yet, God still offered his grace and redemption to all.  In the closing words of another Ellerton hymn (“The Day Thou Gavest”), we as Americans might do good to remember the humility of those Victorians of ages past:

So be it, Lord; Thy Throne shall never, like earth’s proud empires, pass away;

Thy Kingdom stands, and grows forever, Till all Thy creatures own Thy sway.

John Ellerton